BELARUS: Political Prisoners Facing Oppression

Global Geopolitics & Political Economy / IPS

By Robert Stefanicki

WARSAW, Jan 24, 2012 (IPS) – "I had to fight to be treated like a human, not animal," dissident Nikolai Avtukhovich wrote from prison. Last month Avtukhovich, Belarusian political activist and entrepreneur, convicted to five years in the penal colony for illegal storage of five cartridges for a hunting rifle, cut his veins.

The reason for such a dramatic move may seem trivial: he was put into one cell with homosexuals.

But the subculture of Belarusian prisons is brutal: gays and rapists are at the very bottom of the hierarchy. They are obliged to announce their status to the fellowship when they arrive in a new place so that other inmates will not lose their status coming in contact with them.

Prisoners are told they must not shake their hand, eat with them, nor stay in one room. Otherwise you could become "dirty" too; then the "clean" fellows may harass or beat you.

So Avtukhovich went for self-mutilation to get moved out of those cells. Soon after recovering from cutting his veins, Avtukhovich was on Jan. 17 found guilty of "malicious abuse of the colony regime" and ordered to be transferred to a high-security indoor jail, where conditions of confinement are much more severe.

In the penal colony convicts live in the barracks, able to spend free time outdoors. In closed jail they are cramped in the cells, and entitled only to a one-hour walk round a tiny yard. They have a right only to short visits and a food parcel not more than once a year.

Andrei Sannikov, the most serious rival to president Alexander Lukashenka in the 2010 election, serving five and a half years, faced similar issues. When an "untouchable" prisoner was allocated to his solitary cell, Sannikov immediately called hunger strike and stood close to the door. The new inmate was taken away within minutes.

"We have not witnessed that before: prison administration using the informal order to humiliate jailed dissidents," journalist and former prisoner of conscience Andrzej Poczobut told IPS.

It is neither the prison administration nor the judiciary who call the shots. According to Poczobut "all decisions regarding political prisoners are taken at the high level, usually by KGB." KGB is an acronym for the Committee for State Security.

"The regime is open in its intention: to break the dissidents, make them beg for mercy," Poczobut said. Last summer this journalist from Grodno got a suspended sentence of three years for insulting Lukashenka. He was released after three months detention.

"Initially the investigators tried to intimidate me, but overall I was not treated badly," Poczobut said. "They knew I was a journalist, ready to report any mistreatment abroad. And unlike most of the other inmates, I was conscious of my rights, having printed prison regulations with me."

Prisoners seen as troublemakers are more prone to harassment and punitive measures. From day one in jail Avtukhovich helped other prisoners write complaints, then went on hunger strike to protest the refusal of medical assistance.

A week before Avtukhovich, Nikolai Statkevich, another former candidate for presidency in Belarus, was also sentenced to more rigorous imprisonment. He is serving six years for organising "anti-state riots" (means the demonstrations against election rigging).

Statkevich was declared by officials to be a "malicious violator" of the order who has refused to follow the path of correction. "He is seeking no early release on parole, but is going to wait till the end of his sentence and lead a criminal lifestyle in the future."

According to his wife, the politician was accused of failing to carry a prisoner’s number tag on his clothes, and for failing to list handkerchiefs among his personal belongings.

Most of the 800 people arrested a year ago following after-election protests have been set free. President Lukashenka left eight of his enemies behind bars, the most high profile and as the regime sees it, unrepentant.

"This is the personal vengeance of Lukaskenka," Ales Kirkievich, one of the leaders of the anti-regime Youth Front told IPS. Asked about his own treatment in jail, Kirkievich said it was "not as bad as in the 1930s, but certainly far from EU standards."

Arrested in January 2011, and sentenced to four years of penal colony, Kirkievich was released in September after applying for a presidential pardon.

That is exactly what Lukashenka wants. "They hope to come out of jail as heroes. No way," the President said recently, responding to questions about political prisoners.

Last September Uadzimir Kobiets, staff member of Sannikov’s presidential campaign, gave public testimony about his stay in a KGB prison on the Charter97.org website.

"Masked KGB officers armed with batons and paralysers abused us, made us run on steep stairs while handcuffed, do squats, forced us to undress, then to stand naked with feet wide apart for a long time. I felt pain, but must not move – otherwise the oppressors kicked and beat me."

The worst was mental torture. Interrogators told Kobiets that the fate of his wife and children depended on his behaviour. "I thought I was in a hopeless situation. This lawlessness was suffocating, there was no one I could address," he wrote.

Kobiets signed a collaboration agreement and got out of jail.

His testimony confirms Kiril Semianchuk’s story. In March this opposition activist from Grodno applied for political asylum in Poland, saying he suffered from beating and sleep deprivation in KGB custody.

"During the interrogation, KGB officers beat me with shoes filled with gravel, one of them strangling me. I was punched in the face, and my head would hit the wall," Semianchuk told Belsat TV.

After a whole night of such interrogation, the politician agreed to appear on public television and express views critical of the opposition. He also signed an agreement to cooperate with the KGB. "They showed me a small plastic bag with white powder and threatened to plant it on me, so that I could be sentenced to 10 years," he added.

The government in Minsk denies allegations of torture and ignores repeated calls from the EU and the U.S. to release all political prisoners.

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2012.

This article may not be republished, broadcast, framed, or redistributed without the written permission of IPS – Inter Press Service. Republication of this material without permission from IPS, the copyright holder, constitutes a violation of United States and international copyright laws and may result in legal action.


BELARUS: Despite Crackdown, Opposition is Defiant

Global Geopolitics & Political Economy / IPS

By Robert Stefanicki

WARSAW, Jun 6, 2011 (IPS) – President Alexander Lukashenko has locked most of his rivals in jail, but the Belarus opposition continues to work diligently to isolate the dictator.

The December 2010 elections left Lukashenko – president of Belarus since 1994 – at helm for one more term. But subsequent events have revealed how unpopular at home and isolated internationally Lukashenko really is.

On the surface, the president is on top. Courts have sentenced not only opposition leaders, but also scores of other participants in the demonstrations that followed announcements that Lukashenko had won the election with 80 percent of the vote. An estimated 20,000 disgruntled people assembled in the main square of the capital, Minsk, Dec. 19 – violence during these demonstrations is widely believed to have been provoked by Lukashenko lackeys in order to pave the way for a crackdown against his opponents.

By the end of May Lukashenko had settled scores with all his rivals. Eight men stood against him in the elections. One – Victar Tiareshchenka – was a stooge, standing solely to generate the illusion of a competitive election. Two others – Yaroslav Romantchuk and Ryhor Kastusiou – stepped down, saving their necks.

The rest of the candidates have been convicted. Mikola Statkievich and Dmitry Us respectively received six and five years in labour camps for "driving massive riots, that led to arson, property damage, acts of violence and resistance". Andrei Sannikau is to spend five and a half years in prison. Uazhimir Niklayeu and Vital Rymashevsky received suspended sentences of two years.

Franak Viachorka, a young activist and son of veteran opposition figure Vincuk Viachorka, told IPS that in response to his "anti-state" activity he was expelled from university and sentenced to jail. Despite serious heart disease he was drafted to the army, where again he challenged the authorities – fighting for commands to be given in the Belarusian language rather than in Russian.

IPS also spoke with Ales Zarembiuk, a regional representative of the For Freedom Movement, a party set up by Alexander Milinkievich, one of the most outspoken opposition leaders. A victim of political repression, last year Zarembiuk received refugee status in Poland.

Viachorka and Zarembiuk point to three possible motives behind the recent crackdown. First is Lukashenko’s personal vendetta against people who dared to challenge him.

Second, they say this is an attempt to extract credits from Europe in return for the release of prisoners. This is a tactic Lukashenko used several years ago, with success.

Third, the activists say that the dictator is scared.

"Lukashenko is weak as never before," Viachorka said. "After mass protests in December, he lost confidence. His confidants abandon him, though this process is not massive yet. Now he is losing more ground due to the economic crisis. He is like Muammar Gaddafi, but without oil."

According to Zarembiuk, real support for the president does not exceed 35 percent. His followers usually come from villages and small towns. The young and educated are against him, but factory workers are divided, with most pensioners and people living in Soviet-style cooperatives backing him. "Those people have Soviet mentality, they trust in what state propaganda says, so they believe that the crisis is temporary," Zarembiuk says.

The problem is a lack of clear alternatives. The opposition seems increasingly divided and terrorised.

Mutual trust is hard to come by, with accusations flying about which leaders are secret service moles. But, Viachorka insists this view is a convenient "myth" spread by those in the West who are seeking ways to engage with Lukashenko. "True, there are many [secret service] agents in the opposition ranks, but the current crackdown clearly shows who is who – the true leaders get harsh sentences."

Now, Viachorka explained, Lukashenko’s opponents are looking for new leaders among businessmen and workers. "Our strategy is to weaken the regime by all possible means. Unions of the Electronics Industry and the MAZ car factory declared readiness for a general strike. The situation is slowly maturing to a peaceful revolution, which should start in September or October," Viachorka predicted.

To help this happen, the opposition is urging the international community to increase pressure on Lukashenko. Mikola Statkievich during his trial appealed to European leaders: "Do not negotiate with the dictator."

Europe is not sure how to react. So far 188 Belarusian dignitaries responsible for persecution of political opponents and for election fraud have been banned from entry to the EU and their assets have been frozen. There are ongoing discussions about imposing economic sanctions, but so far member states lack unanimity.

"In the last 17 years since Lukashenko came to power the EU tried different attitudes, from engagement to confrontation – none of them effective," Zarembiuk said. "I think the West should not only slap further sanctions on, but also indict the dictator for his crimes. On the other hand, I am afraid that this move would prompt Lukashenko to sell Belarus to Russia."

On Jun. 4, the Eurasian Economic Community, controlled by Moscow, promised the debt-ridden government of Belarus a grant of 3 billion dollars over the next three years.

"Alexander Lukashenko has been driven to the wall," Stanislav Bogdankievich, former president of the Belarus Central Bank, said to the Tut.by news agency. "Now he must fulfil Russian demands and privatise state companies."

Russian Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin declared that "in the next three years Belarus must privatise assets worth 7.5 billion dollars". Russians want to purchase key Belarusian power suppliers, chemical companies and carmakers.

Opposition activists are afraid that the Kremlin plans to reintroduce the Russian ruble in Belarus, sealing the smaller neighbour’s vassal status.

"For Belarus, Russia is the number one danger," Viachorka said. "This danger will remain in place even after Lukashenko is gone."

The president is reluctant to give away his most valuable assets, knowing this would significantly weaken his position. He also knows that the Russian government is far from guaranteeing his stay in power. He has little room to manoeuvre.

The economy is in a pitiful state. A recent 60-percent devaluation of the Belarusian ruble has not helped much.

From January till the end of May, inflation increased 20 percent. Staples like flour and buckwheat grains have gone up in price two or three times. And due to lack of foreign currency, many companies have stopped production.

Not certain of a continued credit line from Europe, and distrustful of Moscow, Lukashenko is desperately looking for new sources of capital. It has been reported that he has turned to China for help and that they have promised him loans worth 15 billion dollars.

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2011.

This article may not be republished, broadcast, framed, or redistributed without the written permission of IPS – Inter Press Service. Republication of this material without permission from IPS, the copyright holder, constitutes a violation of United States and international copyright laws and may result in legal action.