Wheat Price Instability No Reason to Panic

Global Geopolitics & Political Economy / IDN

By IDN World Desk

IDN-InDepth NewsAnalysis

(IDN) – The current wheat price volatility is no reason to panic. Baseless fright in fact hurts poor people, warns the Washington-based International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

Maximo Torero, director of the Institute’s markets, trade, and institutions division says that apparent similarities between today’s rising wheat prices and the food-price crisis of 2007-2008 are far from real.

"Suggestions to the contrary serve to drive up prices and hurt poor people, who spend much or most of their incomes on food. They need neither jittery markets nor ad hoc protectionism, which has exacerbated past food crises," he says in a brief circulated by IFPRI, based in Washington.

At first glance, the current situation can look like an unfolding rerun of the last crisis. Russia, hit by drought and wildfires, has banned exports of wheat well into 2011. Ukraine and Kazakhstan are weighing possible restrictions of their own. Unrest in Mozambique has been blamed on rising prices.

All this evokes 2007-2008, when more than a dozen major food producers halted or restricted exports. This was meant to protect domestic markets as staple prices soared and global grain stocks fell to record lows, but it put even more pressure on commodity prices. Global market stability was sacrificed at the altar of domestic politics. This sparked riots in countries starved of food imports.

"However, the situation today is different in a number of ways," insists Torero, and adds: "We are able to cope with lost production better than we did two years ago. The latest figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s World Agricultural Outlook Board indicate that wheat production in 2010-2011 will amount to 656 million metric tons, 7 percent more than in 2007-2008, even after tallying all known losses."

Moreover, global wheat stocks stand at around 175 million metric tons — nearly 50 million metric tons more than in 2007-2008. The United States alone holds reserves of 26 million metric tons — more than enough to cover the combined estimated loss of 18 million metric tons from Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and the European Union.

Another important reason the situation today is different than in 2007-2008 is that bad weather — a perennial wildcard in agriculture and commodity markets — has not hit all producers. While Russia and others tally losses from drought or floods, the United States — the world’s largest source — enjoys a good harvest, as do Argentina, Australia, India, and Uzbekistan.

Yet another reason not to panic, according to Torero, is that the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) food price index rose 5 percent during August, prompting comparisons to previous spikes.

"This might seem dramatic, but in actual fact the peak of 176 seen in August was a mere 1 percent higher than the January 2010 level of 174. This is all the more striking because the index includes not only grains but also oil, fats, and sugar — the prices of which also have risen (and for separate reasons). In other words, for all the recent talk of runaway wheat prices, the impact has been minimal," says IFPRI’s expert.

In an attempt to allay uncalled for fears, he says that in order for world wheat prices to drive up the price of bread, they would have to stay high for a prolonged period. In 2007, prices rose continuously for months on end before hitting consumers.

"Today, prices are volatile. Two points bear emphasizing. The first is that volatility is not the same thing as inflation. The second is that volatility has stayed within the normal range since the end of the last food-price crisis. Indeed, recent spikes notwithstanding, the prevailing trend is flat or slightly downward. In consequence, there should be no knock-on effects," predicts Torero.

He goes on to say that spot prices for wheat rose by nearly one-quarter in July and by more than 50 percent between the start of June and early August. But weekly price increases, compared with four weeks previously, were no larger in July 2010 than in May or November 2009. Indeed, when compared over a 12-week span, prices have climbed less in the past three months than they did at the end of 2009.

Likewise, futures prices for September contracts on the Chicago Board of Trade posted their biggest daily increases since 2008 twice during the first week of August. "But these were aberrations, extreme values of return that remain freakish and highly unlikely when viewed against supply, demand, and returns in the futures market over the past six years," states Torero.

Moreover, these spikes involved nearest-delivery contracts, looking ahead one month. Contracts of longer maturity are a better guide to overall market conditions. These also have adjusted upward — but at a much calmer pace. This is contrary to what happened three years ago, when futures prices of distinct maturities climbed relentlessly and in lockstep.

According to IFPRI, the situation today also differs with respect to other key commodities. The World Agricultural Outlook Board and FAO expect maize production in 2010-2011 to exceed the total for 2007-2008 by 4 percent and 5 percent, respectively.

The FAO expects production to increase by 3 percent for rice and 4 percent for coarse grains such as rye, barley, and sorghum. And the price of a barrel of oil today hovers around US$74 — against US$131 in June 2008.

Torero says that if policy decisions such as Russia’s appear to have overlooked much of this, so too has public discourse. For example, initial news analysis tied the recent unrest in Mozambique to the price of wheat — wrongly so.

Rather, the government raised the prices of basic food and non-food items to reflect the rising cost of imports from South Africa, Mozambique’s main supplier. These have become more expensive as Mozambique’s currency, the metical, has fallen against the South African rand by 21 percent since January 2010 and 47 percent since September 2009.

Torero concludes: "More thoughtful analysis has followed in recent days but not until after the earlier, more reflexive narrative had already caused another global price spike. That was the last thing consumers — especially poor ones — needed." (IDN-InDepthNews/13.09.2010)

Copyright © 2010 IDN-InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters

This article may not be republished, broadcast, framed, or redistributed without the written permission the original author or copyright holder.