DEVELOPMENT: Poor Hit by Recession and Tax Havens

Global Geopolitics Net Sites / IPS
Monday, October 27, 2008

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2008.

David Cronin

BRUSSELS, Oct 27 (IPS) – With signs of a recession preoccupying policy-makers in industrialised countries, prospects for the success of an international conference on providing finance to the world’s poor do not appear high.

The United Nations sponsored event, beginning next month in the Qatari capital Doha, comes at a time when many governments, particularly in Europe, are reassessing commitments they have made to improve the lot of the most vulnerable.

Some of the European Union’s largest member states have recently deemed the EU’s plans to combat climate change, a phenomenon that affects poor countries disproportionately, too costly given the changing economic circumstances. Foreign aid budgets, already shrinking, are likely to suffer because of the same rationale.

Although the EU has been credited by many anti-poverty activists with playing a constructive role during a related conference on improving the effectiveness of development aid in Accra, Ghana, in September, the same campaigners feel that the bloc’s preparations for Doha leave much to be desired.
[Read more...]

ECONOMY: Asia, EU Leaders Moot Deep Global Reforms

Global Geopolitics Net Sites / IPS
Monday, October 27, 2008

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2008.

Antoaneta Bezlova

BEIJING, Oct 27 (IPS) – A two-day meeting of European and Asian leaders in Beijing has produced a joint statement pledging a coordinated response to the global financial crisis, but concrete action is seen dependant on the entry of Asia’s emerging economies into global policy-setting institutions.

The leaders emerged from the ASEM meeting on Saturday, calling for an ”effective and comprehensive reform of the international monetary and financial systems” through consultations with ”all stakeholders and the relevant international financial institutions”.

While little specifics were offered on what would replace the Bretton Woods system, that has governed international finance since the end of World War II, European politicians appraised the meeting as a success in drawing the support of Asian countries for reshaping the global economic structure.
[Read more...]

AFRICA: Financial Crisis May Increase Pressure for Debt Repayment

Global Geopolitics Net Sites – Global Analyst Online / IPS
Saturday, October 25, 2008

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2008.

Stanley Kwenda*

MANZINI (Swaziland), Oct 25 (IPS) – The collapse of the financial markets may force the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to come down hard on African countries to repay their debts because the huge rescue packages for collapsing banks will need to be recuperated.

This is the view of Munyaradzi Gwisai of the International Socialist Organisation (ISO) of Zimbabwe. He spoke at the recently held seventh Southern Africa Social Forum in Manzini, Swaziland. The ISO is concerned with justice and liberation and working towards a ‘‘future socialist society”.

The demand for repayment ‘‘will result in further cuts on education, health and social services budgets, which will result in severe and savage cuts on the standards of living of the people in Africa and will leave the attainment of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals in danger,” said
Gwisai.
[Read more...]

SOUTHERN AFRICA: More Debt But Still No Development

Global Geopolitics Net Sites / IPS
Saturday, October 25, 2008

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2008.

Stanley Kwenda*

MANZINI (Swaziland), Oct 25 (IPS) – Shupikai Machinya, a Zimbabwean cross-border trader who attended the recent Southern Africa Social Forum in Manzini, Swaziland, is one of the many delegates who wanted to understand just how a country ends up in debt.

Machinya frequently travels to South Africa where she acquires basic goods for resale in Zimbabwe. In Zimbabwe basic commodities such as salt, sugar, rice, cooking oil, bathing soap and maize-meal are rarities as a result of the devastating economic problems that the country is facing.

Although she belongs to the fledging Cross-Border Traders Association of Zimbabwe, debt and development remain distant issues for her. ‘‘I only know that debt is money borrowed by the government from outside but how it’s used and for what reason nobody knows,” Machinya told IPS.

‘‘We have heard that our government has borrowed lots of money since independence to build roads but no new roads were built after 1980 (the year Zimbabwe achieved independence). They even lied that they wanted to make the road from Harare to Beitbridge dual carriage as nothing has happened.” Beitbridge is a border post between Zimbabwe and South Africa.

The just ended social forum meeting in Manzini discussed debt among Southern African countries and how it can be effectively managed for the benefit of communities.

The three-day meeting, attended by several civil society organisations from the Southern African Development Community (SADC) region, resolved to initiate debt audits to force governments to account for monies borrowed.

But why the fuss about debt?

‘‘The problem of debt is central, it’s a social problem. The United Nations Development Programme estimates that poor countries pay four times more than they borrow, yet they ought to be spending more on health and education,” argued Dakarayi Matanga, executive director at the Zimbabwe Coalition on Debt and Development (ZIMCODD).

ZIMCODD is a civil society organisation interested in developing Zimbabwean people’s capacity to redress the debt burden and unjust trade practices and building and promoting alternatives to the neoliberal economic and social agenda.

Matanga regards debt audits as necessary to understand how debts are incurred and repaid and whether citizens are involved in the whole process of incurring them. Matanga urged SADC countries to initiate debt audits, saying regional countries have a common history of debt and how it affects citizens.

He gave a comprehensive synopsis of the different kinds of debt that countries accrue. He said debt is a situation where a person, country or organisation owes some money or possessions to another person, country or organisation.

He said there are several kinds of debts. Bilateral debt is owed by one government to another. Commercial debt is to private sector creditors and commercial banks. Domestic debt is owed to creditors resident in the same country and is denominated in local currency. External debt is owed to foreign creditors and denominated in foreign currency.

Multilateral debt is owed to a consortium of lenders, like the World Bank or regional development banks such as the African Development Bank. Official debt, he said, is owed to public sector lenders. Publically guaranteed debt originates from loans made to state-owned enterprises
or private companies where the payment is guaranteed by the government of the debtor country.

‘‘We should be concerned about the issue of a country’s indebtedness because debt is an obstacle to human development. Debt results in the use of scarce resources for servicing debt instead of investing in people’s wellbeing,” said Matanga.

According to ZIMCODD, Zimbabwe is one of the countries with a high and unsustainable level of indebtedness. Zimbabwe’s total external debt stood at 4,9 billion dollars in 2007, an amount as big as the country’s gross domestic product (GDP).

Matanga further stressed that for ordinary citizens like Machinya to benefit from debt, a host of things have to be put in place. He recommended that SADC civil society organisations keep an eye on government borrowing; institute legal reforms through advocacy to parliaments to force governments to be accountable to citizens; and launch mass public education on debt issues.

*This is the first of two articles. Follow the link below to read the second.

EDUCATION-US: Credit Crunch Hits College Students

Global Geopolitics Net Sites / IPS
Thursday, October 23, 2008

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2008.

Matthew Cardinale

ATLANTA, Oct 23 (IPS) – The credit crunch is limiting college access for some students in the United States by making it more difficult for them or their parents to obtain student loans to finance the steep cost of a four-year education.

Sophomore Armando Huipe, 19, found himself with a 4,500-dollar bill to the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), after he and his father were both declined for private student loans to help pay for Huipe’s fall 2008 semester.

Huipe cannot register for more classes until the bill is paid off. He receives a grant from the State of California that pays most of his tuition. He also takes out a federal Stafford loan for about 5,000 dollars per year.

However, he is still short about 13,000 dollars per year toward paying the total cost of tuition, fees, room, board, books, travel, and incidentals, he told IPS.

Huipe does not qualify for a federal Pell Grant, aimed at low-income students, because his parents are middle-class and make about 90,000 dollars per year. ”I don’t know if they take into consideration a mortgage and a car payment,” Huipe said.

”I applied to Citibank, Wells Fargo, and Chase. Wells Fargo I applied on my own once, and applied with my father as a co-signer and they also denied me [then]. He has a mortgage out and a car loan out,” Huipe said.

In his freshman year, Huipe’s parents put some of his educational expenses on credit cards. ”That was what we were going to do this quarter but I just didn’t let my parents do it,” Huipe said, adding they have high interest rates.

Now, Huipe is thinking about dropping out of school and postponing his studies in biochemisty in order to work and save money, and maybe move back in with his parents. If he does this, however, his existing student loans will become immediately repayable.

Across the U.S., the economic downturn has affected loan access for students in at least two ways. First, it has led banks to suspend or discontinue offering private student loans, upon which many students and parents rely. Other banks have tightened their lending, raising the minimum credit score for which they will approve a loan.

Second, it has also prompted banks to pull out of the business of providing loans through the Federal Family Education Loan Programme (FFELP), even though those loans are backed by the federal government.

So far, 137 lenders have suspended or discontinued their participation in FFELP and 36 lenders have completely stopped offering private student loans, according to finaid.org, an informational website.

Sallie Mae, Citibank, and Bank of America had been the first, second, and third largest student loan originators in 2006 and 2007, respectively, but each has suspended making private loans.

The national top 100 student lenders, including the College Board, College Solutions Network, Frost National Bank, HSBC, PlainsCapital Bank, Sovereign Bank, and TCF Bank, have stopped offering FFELP loans. Access Group and NelNet have stopped offering private student loans.

Even though the FFELP loans are backed by the federal government, lenders are pulling out mainly because ”they have not been able to solve their liquidity problems. They just don’t have sources of money to lend,” Larry Zaglaniczny, vice president for governmental relations for the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators, told IPS.

”The credit crunch is not having an effect in the availability of federal loans. There are problems; we’ve not heard of any access problems. On the other hand, with private loans, they’re more difficult to get. Fees have gone up. Interest rates have gone up,” Zaglaniczny said.

Members of the U.S. Congress were obviously concerned about the health of the FFELP programme when they authorised the Department of Education to purchase FFELP loans from private lenders in order to replenish the banks’ liquidity.

The Ensuring Continued Access to Student Loans Act of 2008 authorised these purchases through July 2009. In September 2008, Congress voted to extend the Act for another year; the extension was just signed by President Bush on Oct. 7.

”Continuing constraints in our capital markets have posed challenges for students and student lenders throughout the last year,” Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Education Secretary Margaret Spellings said in a joint press release.

”Our financing programme has supported just over 40 percent of the [FFELP] loans that have been disbursed this year. Over 800 lenders have enrolled in our loan purchase programme,” Paulson and Spellings said.

Meanwhile, Sens. Ted Kennedy, Charles Schumer and others have been encouraging schools across the nation to enroll in the Direct Loan Programme, where students essentially borrow directly from the U.S. Treasury.

However, for some families this academic year, all of this may be too little too late.

Many students and parents are often forced to take out private student loans, at least for part of the cost of education each year, for several reasons. These are the loans currently drying up.

The amount of private student loans has increased by over 750 percent, from 1.5 billion dollars annually 10 years ago, to 17 billion dollars today, while total student aid has increased only 61 percent during the same period, according to the College Board, a nonprofit association of colleges and universities.

With the cost of education rising every year, federal student loans and grants tend not to cover the entire cost of education.

In the 2007 academic year, average annual in-state tuition costs were 6,185 dollars for public universities and 23,712 dollars for private ones, according to the College Board. Room and board charges together average 7,404 and 8,595 dollars, respectively. This still does not include fees, books, supplies, travel, or incidentals.

One reason students turn to private loans is because there are annual limits, as well as lifetime limits, for the amount students can borrow under FFELP’s Stafford Loan programme.

While low-income students are also eligible for need-based grants such as the Pell Grants — which were also recently increased by the new Democratic-controlled Congress –middle-class families like Huipe’s tend to be ineligible for such grants or are awarded smaller amounts.

Earlier this month, Sen. Schumer wrote a letter to Chairman Ben Bernarke of the Federal Reserve System and Treasury Secretary Paulson, warning them of the situation.

”As you continue to respond to this debilitating credit crisis, I am urging you to keep a close eye on the student loan segment of the market,” Schumer wrote.

”Now more than ever, students and parents are concerned about their ability to pay for a college education. As banks continue to tighten lending criteria, increase borrowing costs, or simply restrict lending entirely, some students will inevitably be hurt,” he said.

ECONOMY-US: It’s Not the ”Greedy Poor People”

Global Geopolitics Net Sites / IPS
Thursday, October 23, 2008

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2008.

Analysis by William Fisher

NEW YORK, Oct 23 (IPS) – A 31-year-old law designed to put an end to ”redlining” and other restrictive practices that effectively shut poor and minority families out of home-ownership and neighbourhood development is being attacked by conservative commentators as a major cause of today’s sub-prime mortgage mess.

The charge is being incessantly repeated by some of the so-called mainstream media as well as by right-wing bloggers.

For many years, local and regional banks were happy to take deposits from people who lived in deprived neighbourhoods. A large proportion of these depositors were members of racial minority groups.

But the banks did not extend credit to these depositors. Small businesses did not receive finance. Mortgage loans were not made. Supermarkets and other shops were not built, forcing residents to travel miles for their household needs. Local jobs dwindled. Crime rose. Riots broke out in some cities in the U.S. Whole neighbourhoods fell apart.
[Read more...]

ECONOMY-US: From the Guys Who Brought You Enron…

Global Geopolitics Net Sites / IPS
Thursday, October 23, 2008

All rights reserved, IPS – Inter Press Service, 2008.

Adrianne Appel

BOSTON, Oct 23 (IPS) – The global credit agencies Moody’s, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch propelled the financial meltdown by giving high marks to failing financial companies and their risky, sub-prime investments, lawmakers said Wednesday.

”The story of the credit rating agencies is a story of colossal failure,” said Rep. Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Oversight and Government Affairs Committee.

”Millions of investors rely on them for independent, objective assessments. The rating agencies broke this bond of trust, and federal regulators ignored the warning signs and did nothing to protect the public,” Waxman said.

Credit agencies began in the early 1900s and have grown to rate a vast array of institutions, businesses, individual investments and even cities, states and nations, as to their credit worthiness. The credit rating agencies have been criticised in the past for the power they yield over nations that have entered the global bond market in search of cash. Any downgrade in ratings can wreak havoc for a nation seeking cash.
[Read more...]